User talk:Aewold

Welcome!

Hello, Aewold, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -zappa.jak e (talk) 07:39, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question about Campbell (index)

I found a page you created, Campbell (index), while looking at a list of uncategorized pages, and I'm not sure I understand what it's supposed to be about. It seems like a description of how to use the indexes of some sort of records, but doesn't specify what records or why it's listed under Campbell instead of some generic title. It also doesn't make any claims to notability, and reads like a how-to guide, which Wikipedia is not, and so I'm inclined to tag it for proposed deletion, but I wanted to get some input from you first, though, about why you created it and what it's meant to be about. You can just reply here -- I'll be watching this page. Thanks! Pinball22 16:55, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Campbell (index)

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Campbell (index), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Brianyoumans 10:11, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Herb Peterson info

Hi Aewold -- I'm glad you added the day-date of birth to the Herb Peterson article. I could not find that myself previously, and was criticized. I wonder, can you describe your source? Perhaps the specific source could be added to the article. Also, do you know / does your source say where he was born? If you can, add to the article, or to the talk page of the article, or reply to my Talk page. There was actually a bit of a debate before, about whether it is known that Herb Peterson is American or not, which a location of birth would help address, and is a datum that can always be put into a biography article. Either way, thanks for your contribution already. :) doncram (talk) 03:14, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How?

how are you able to start the article america's toughtest jobs without it being instantly deleted??? Pyromania153 (talk) 03:15, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why my entry was accepted and others were not. Perhaps because I had a few links to other pages within Wikipedia, and included a lot of content from the show's website. --Aewold (talk) 00:35, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Military Tombstone Abbreviations

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Military Tombstone Abbreviations, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Kesac (talk) 23:06, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Join the discussion about Military Tombstone Abbreviations

Go to this WikiProject Military history discussion for a proposed discussion about Military Tombstone Abbreviations, an article you created and defended from a earlier PROD. Thanks 72.244.207.143 (talk) 14:22, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Family2.0

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Family2.0. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family2.0. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:02, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Gris (card game)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Gris (card game) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 11 § Gris (card game) until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]